LACMA places AI art within a longer history of computation

More than 200 digital artworks have been offered to the Los Angeles County Museum of Art for donation over the coming years, placing contemporary AI practice within a collection reaching back to early computer art. LACMA announced the initiative on 22 October through its Digital Leaders group. The offer describes a programme of gifts, rather than the completed delivery or exhibition of every work.[1][2]

The museum names historical figures including Rebecca Allen, Harold Cohen, Manfred Mohr and Vera Molnár alongside contemporary artists such as Refik Anadol, Sarah Meyohas, Trevor Paglen and Lauren Lee McCarthy. That range gives the announcement its significance: computational art has several histories, and recent generative tools belong within that larger field.[2]

A collection with a history before generative AI

LACMA traces its engagement with the subject to its Art and Technology programme, established in 1967. Its more recent work includes the 2023 exhibition Coded: Art Enters the Computer Age, 1952–1982. The planned gifts extend that curatorial interest across different generations of artists and technologies.[2]

It would flatten the collection to describe all the works as AI-generated images. Software can be a drawing instrument, a set of rules, an interactive system or a material that determines how a work behaves. Placing these practices together allows viewers to compare how artists assign decisions to a machine and what they retain as authors.[1][2]

Collecting the work includes preserving how it behaves

Digital art also changes the practical job of a museum. A static file, a program running on obsolete hardware and a work dependent on an external service have different preservation needs. Keeping a screenshot may preserve an appearance while losing an interaction or a process that is central to the work.[1]

For works involving AI, that general problem can include the model, its version, the inputs and the conditions under which the artist considered an output complete. These are implications for conserving such work, not details of a preservation plan disclosed in the announcement. The museum’s ability to document the intended experience becomes part of making the collection available to future audiences.[1][2]

The proposed gifts create room for those comparisons across decades. An audience could encounter a recent AI work alongside earlier experiments in algorithmic choice and machine-made form, with the artist’s decisions supplying the connection. That is a more substantial curatorial opportunity than treating a new tool as the beginning of digital art.[2]

Report an error or suggest a correction